The meeting place is quite huge. And there are lot of booths from different partners of Google Cloud.
The keynote was quite abstract and a little boring, so I chose to walk around different booths for fun. Here are some useful conversations and information I collected:
[HashiCorp: company for Terraform and Nomad]
Q: How short could Terraform support a new service in cloud provider, such as Lake Formation in AWS?
A: It depends on requirements from users.
Q: Only users who paid for enterprise version of Terraform?
A: No. All users, include who use open source version, will be considered to support a new service in cloud. We published new version of Terraform quarterly, although we can’t make sure every new services in this quarter will be included.
[Confluent: company for Apache Kafka]
Q: Could I use ksql in Kafka as standard SQL?
A: Currently, no. ksql only supports self-defined syntax in Kafka. It looks really like SQL, but it’s actually another language.
Q: Could I use ksql to access a table in MySQL?
A: Yes. You can export a table in MySQL to be a ‘kstream‘. Then you can use ksql to access this ‘kstream’.
[Tableau: you know what I mean…]
Q: What are the new updates for Tableau in recent one year?
A: We published a new function called ‘Ask Data’. You can type in query with natural language, and it will translate them to tableau query, by using state-of-the-art NLP technologies.
After I type in some query like ‘avg price in Manly’, it worked very well. But if I type in query like ‘top 5 price near Chatswood’, Tableau failed to get the right answer.
A: You know, NLP is really hard so we only support a range of anonymous for query words.
[elastic: company for ElasticSearch and Kibana]
Q: What’s the biggest cluster of ElasticSearch in production?
A: Well, a lot of big companies use quit big ElasticSearch clusters, such as Netflix, eBay. But we don’t know which one is the biggest because they won’t tell us every details of their clusters 🙂
Q: Is there a product in Google Cloud that could continually import data from MySQL and export them to Cloud Storage or BigTable?
A: Yes. Cloud Data Fusion will be your best choice.
In the booth of ASUS (it produced a lot of chrome books for Google), I noticed the Dev Board which contain a edge-TPU.
The demo use “mobilenet_ssd v2” as the backbone for object detection. Just as my choice.
I got a desktop computer to train deep learning model last week. The GPU is GTX1050TI with 4GB memory which is enough for basic training on object detection. But the CPU is too old. Therefore when I run the training process, the idle of CPU is 0%. I need to reduce the burden of it.
I tried DALI from Nvidia. Although confessed that it is powerful, I also noticed that DALI is too specific to be used for customer dataset. For example, if I want to use complicate label structures more than just ‘bounding box’ coordinates, I can’t find any code example to in DALI to meet this requirement. By the way, the GPU memory in my computer is not big enough, so if moved computation burden from CPU to GPU, I would have to reduce batch size for training. That’s not a good option too.
You can use jpeg4py, library dedicated to encode big jpeg files much faster than PIL. Just read image using this library, then transform it to PIL.
After changed my code from using ‘cv.imread()’ to jpeg4py.JPEG().decode()’, the average training time for 1000 batches in my mode boosted improved 700 seconds to 670 seconds. This is just the simple and useful solution I need.
SSDLite is a variant of Single Shot Multi-box Detection. It uses MobileNetV2 instead of VGG as backbone. Thus it can make detection extremely fast. I was trying to implement SSDLite from the code base of ssd.pytorch. Although it’s not a easy work, I finally learn a lot from the entire process.
First, I just replace VGG with MobileNetV2 in the code. However the loss will stop to reduce after a while of training. Without knowing the reason, I have to compare my code with another open source project ssds.pytorch, to try to find the cause.
Very soon, I noticed that unlike VGG backbone, which built detection framework from 38×38 feature map, the MobileNetV2 use 19×19 feature map as its first detection layer.
“For MobileNetV1, we follow the setup in . For MobileNetV2, the first layer of SSDLite is attached to the expansion of layer 15 (with output stride of 16).”
After changed my code as the description of this paper, the loss still couldn’t reduce in training.
In the next three weeks, I tried a lot of methods: change the aspect ratios, use SGDR to replace SGD, change the number of default boxes, even modifying the structure of neural network to be identical to to ssds.pytorch. But none of them solves the problem. There is another weird phenomenon: when I run prediction on my model, it usually gives random output for detection.
Just until last week, I noticed that my model size is about 10MB but the ssds.pytorch’s is 18MB. Why do they have different model size if their models is exactly the same? Through this clue, I eventually get the cause: a large part of my model hasn’t been back-propagated at all!
My old code only implements the forward() of MobileNetV2 which is not enough for the whole model. Therefore I add nn.ModuleList() to build model from a list of layers, as this patch:
Only the nn.ModuleList() will take all layers into back-propagation process and keep them as model weights. Otherwise, the weights will be randomly init and just use for forwarding — that’s why I get random output before.
I think I should be more carefully when adding FPN into my model in the future.
Forverbose messaging see aws.Config.CredentialsChainVerboseErrors
After a while of searching on Google, I got the cause: it can’t find my AWS credential in my computer.
Actually I have ‘~/.aws/credentials’ file, and the ‘access_key_id’, ‘secret_access_key’ are already in it. Like this:
So why can’t Terraform get the credential? The reason is in the ‘provider’ section:
I set the ‘profile’ to ‘analytics’ at first, so the Terraform tried to find something looks like ‘[analytics]’ in ‘~/.aws/credentials’ file, and it failed. The correct way is just set ‘profile’ in ‘provider’ section to ‘default’.
After discussed with technical support guys from AWS, I get more information about how to use all the service of AWS to build a streaming ETL architecture, step by step.
The main architecture could be described by the diagram below:
AWS S3 is the de-facto data lake. All the data, no matter from AWS RDS or AWS Dynamo or other custom ways, could be written into AWS S3 by using some specific format, such as Apache Parquet or Apache ORC (CSV format is not recommend because it’s not suitable for data scan and data compression). Then, data engineers could use AWS Glue to extract the data from AWS S3, transform them (using PySpark or something like it), and load them into AWS Redshift.
For some frequently-used data, they could also be put in AWS Redshift for optimised query. When it is needed to join tables from both AWS S3 and AWS Redshift, we could also use AWS Redshift Spectrum.
BTW, I also joined a workshop about DataBricks’ new Unified Data Analytics and Machine Learning Platform which is built on AWS. It contains
1. Delta Lake for data storage and schema enforcement.
2. Notebook to let user directly write code and run them to process and analyze data by Apache Spark. Just like Jupyter Notebook.
3. MLFlow use above data to train machine learning model.
I used Apache Spark for learning about 4 years ago. At that time, I even need to build java/scala package by myself, upload and run it. Debugging is tedious because I can only scan logs of CLI again and again to find mistakes in code. But now, Databricks give a much more convenient solution for the data scientists and developers.
Normal ETL solutions need to deliver all data from transactional databases to data warehouse. For instance, DBAs or Data Scientists usually deploy a script to export whole table from database to data warehouse each hour. To accelerate this process, we decided to use Streaming ETL solution in AWS(or GCP, if possible).
Firstly, I tested the AWS Data Pipeline. Although it’s called ‘Pipeline’, it needs a Last Modified Column in customer’s MySQL table so it could decide which part of the table should be extracted in each turn. The new rows, which means their Last Modified Column values had been updated, will be extracted. However, our MySQL tables don’t have this column, and adding these column and corresponding logics in code will be too tedious for a old infrastructure. The AWS Data Pipeline is not a suitable solution for us.
Then, I found the tutorial and my colleague found another doc at the same time. Combining these two suggestions, I thought out a viable solution:
Another in-house service read these events and exported them into AWS RedShift
Since the AWS Redshift is a columnar storage data warehouse, inserting/updating/deleting data one by one will severely hurts its performance. So We need to use S3 service to store the intermediate files, and ‘COPY’ command to batch the operations, as below:
Guess what? The type of variable ‘c’ is ‘float64’! Seems Numpy automatically considers a empty array of Python as ‘float64’ type. So the correct code should be:
This time, the type of ‘c’ is ‘int64’
2. Convert a tensor of PyTorch to ‘uint8’
If we want to convert a tensor of PyTorch to ‘float’, we can use tensor.float(). If we want to convert it to ‘int32’, we can use tensor.int().
But if we want to convert the type to ‘uint8’, what should we do? There isn’t any function named ‘uint8()’ for a tensor.
Actually, it’s much quite simple than I expect: